Sorry, could only answer 1 as written; but here are my answers.
1. I don't like the phrase. "smiled" works for me* (Mr. Verbose) But it's so short I can't see how it could be distracting unless you used it every few paragraphs.
2. I use one, but that's just what I'm accustomed to. Whether that's proper writing etiquette, I don't have a clue, but then I couldn't recognize a past participle if it bit me in the ass either.
3. I love first person, particularly writing in it, but reading it as well. Unless the material is crapola, it lends a certain automatic credibility, as in "who would know better what's happening."
4. I think it's charming, though unnecessary. You need to be careful though that billboarding others words don't show the weakness in your own.
5. Generally I find that the creator will come up with many clever possibilities, and that none, or close to it, will apply to me.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 03:02 am (UTC)From:1. I don't like the phrase. "smiled" works for me* (Mr. Verbose) But it's so short I can't see how it could be distracting unless you used it every few paragraphs.
2. I use one, but that's just what I'm accustomed to. Whether that's proper writing etiquette, I don't have a clue, but then I couldn't recognize a past participle if it bit me in the ass either.
3. I love first person, particularly writing in it, but reading it as well. Unless the material is crapola, it lends a certain automatic credibility, as in "who would know better what's happening."
4. I think it's charming, though unnecessary. You need to be careful though that billboarding others words don't show the weakness in your own.
5. Generally I find that the creator will come up with many clever possibilities, and that none, or close to it, will apply to me.