Insecure babbling ahead...
Oct. 31st, 2011 02:48 pmI'm going over some old writing/critiques and I've come across the comment that I use the words "he/him" too many times. The scene has only one character in it -- it's a struggle to survive. Not sure how to write it with out using he/him. I understand that I need to vary my sentence structure so I don't start out each sentence/paragraph with the "He ---> whatever action he does" (and I did watch that) but I'm really at a loss as to how to write the scene without using he/him quite a few times. I wonder if it would have the same impact if I was telling it from the first person POV and was using the pronoun 'I' instead of 'he'? I checked, there were sentences, complete paragraphs even, without the word he. Of course, the notation on those is that I spend too much time on description, that I need action to move the scene along. *headdesk*
I was also told that I shouldn't write scenes with only one character in it. Okay...
I had several very hard critiques with my writer's group and shortly thereafter dropped out. I wasn't writing much and didn't feel like I was getting anything out of the group except the knowledge that I would never measure up. I will admit that there were many other things going on at that time, such as losing my job, so I'm not sure how much of that feeling was accurate and how much was my insecurity, but I do remember one of the members saying, basically, that she didn't care about the characters, found the plot boring, had a difficult time envisioning my world and that "she didn't care enough about anything to keep reading".
I'd like to imagine that my style just wasn't matching theirs but it's hard to hold onto that when they don't like the writing, characters, plot or setting. I used to be better at self-visualizing; perhaps I was just better at self-delusion.
What brought this on? I was thinking of doing NaNoWriMo this year, just to get me back writing. Of course, I say that a lot and the fact that I haven't ever managed to do any writing should make it glaringly obvious that I'm not a reliable or believable source of... well, anything.
Not a complete non sequitur: I don't do "to-do lists" because they inevitably become a "look at everything I failed at" list. I find that true of the run-of-the-mill lists like "do dishes, fold clothes, clean house" and it seems so much worse when applied to something like writing. I doubt I need more in my life to demonstrate that I'm not quite up to snuff.
Wow. I'm a bundle of cheer, aren't I? New rule: don't read the critiques. I would say that I should just focus on the positive parts of the critiques, only the aren't any. I kid you not: In the four crits that I have reviewed today, there is not ONE SINGLE comment on something that I did well. Not one "good word choice" or "good description".
Better idea: Tossing the old critiques without reading them. Perhaps I'm just being insecure about all this, but better insecure that completely depressed, right?
I was also told that I shouldn't write scenes with only one character in it. Okay...
I had several very hard critiques with my writer's group and shortly thereafter dropped out. I wasn't writing much and didn't feel like I was getting anything out of the group except the knowledge that I would never measure up. I will admit that there were many other things going on at that time, such as losing my job, so I'm not sure how much of that feeling was accurate and how much was my insecurity, but I do remember one of the members saying, basically, that she didn't care about the characters, found the plot boring, had a difficult time envisioning my world and that "she didn't care enough about anything to keep reading".
I'd like to imagine that my style just wasn't matching theirs but it's hard to hold onto that when they don't like the writing, characters, plot or setting. I used to be better at self-visualizing; perhaps I was just better at self-delusion.
What brought this on? I was thinking of doing NaNoWriMo this year, just to get me back writing. Of course, I say that a lot and the fact that I haven't ever managed to do any writing should make it glaringly obvious that I'm not a reliable or believable source of... well, anything.
Not a complete non sequitur: I don't do "to-do lists" because they inevitably become a "look at everything I failed at" list. I find that true of the run-of-the-mill lists like "do dishes, fold clothes, clean house" and it seems so much worse when applied to something like writing. I doubt I need more in my life to demonstrate that I'm not quite up to snuff.
Wow. I'm a bundle of cheer, aren't I? New rule: don't read the critiques. I would say that I should just focus on the positive parts of the critiques, only the aren't any. I kid you not: In the four crits that I have reviewed today, there is not ONE SINGLE comment on something that I did well. Not one "good word choice" or "good description".
Better idea: Tossing the old critiques without reading them. Perhaps I'm just being insecure about all this, but better insecure that completely depressed, right?